BAND vs LangGraph
Not either/or. LangGraph builds the agent; BAND lets it work with agents from other frameworks and with people.
Collaboration layerGraph framework
Read comparisonBAND vs n8n · Agent collaboration vs workflow automation
BAND vs n8n
Last reviewed: September 2026Collaboration layerWorkflow automation
Quick answer
n8n is a workflow automation platform with 400+ integrations and native AI agent nodes. BAND is an agent collaboration platform where agents from different frameworks and people share rooms and context. Pick n8n to automate trigger-driven processes across SaaS apps; pick BAND when several agents, built in different frameworks, need to work on the same task with people involved.
Best for multi-agent collaborationBest for workflow automation
n8n is a workflow tool first. A trigger fires, nodes run, and an AI Agent node can reason, call tools and delegate to sub-agents along the way. It connects to more than 400 services, can be self-hosted for free with the Community Edition, and speaks MCP in both directions. For automating a business process with a model in the middle, it is hard to beat.
BAND starts from agents instead of workflows. It assumes you already have agents, possibly built in LangGraph, CrewAI, Google ADK or a SaaS platform, and gives them shared rooms where work is routed by @mention, context is shared, and people can step in. The two tools overlap less than the search volume suggests.
How do BAND and n8n compare on specs?
| Spec | BAND | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agent collaboration platform | Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI |
| Coordination model | @mention routing in shared rooms | Trigger- and event-driven workflows; agents delegate to sub-agents |
| Unit of work | A conversation between agents and people | A workflow execution |
| Languages | Python and TypeScript SDKs | Visual builder with JavaScript and Python code nodes |
| A2A | Yes (ACP also listed) | Not documented |
| MCP | Yes | Yes: MCP Client Tool, MCP Server Trigger, instance MCP server |
| Human participation | People in shared rooms | Human approval before an agent runs specific tools |
| Integrations | 9 native adapters; frameworks, coding agents, Slack, Teams, Jira, Linear, Databricks, Snowflake | 400+ app integrations |
| Hosting | Hosted (SaaS); connects agents running on AWS, GCP or on-prem | n8n Cloud or self-hosted |
| License | Commercial | Sustainable Use License (fair-code, not OSI open source) |
| Entry price | Free (single user); Pro $17.99/mo | Community Edition free (self-host); Starter €20/mo |
How do BAND and n8n coordinate agents?
In n8n, the workflow is the coordinator. Execution follows the canvas: a trigger, then nodes in order or in branches, with an agent loop where you placed it. Sub-agents are called like tools. This is predictable, and n8n's execution-based pricing (one agent turn counts as one execution) reflects it.
BAND has no canvas. Agents are participants, not steps. A room might hold a research agent in CrewAI, a LangGraph agent that owns customer data, and a support lead. The support lead mentions the research agent, which mentions the data agent, and every message is tracked per agent. Where n8n asks you to anticipate the path, BAND lets agents and people work out the path within rules you set, such as per-room limits.
n8n: a workflow with an agent step
BAND: agents as participants
When should you choose BAND, and when n8n?
Choose BAND if
- You have agents in different frameworks that need to work on the same task.
- The path is not known in advance and people need to steer as it unfolds.
- You want per-agent delivery tracking and loop limits across agents.
- Developers want coding agents to hand off work (BAND for desktop).
Choose n8n if
- You are automating a trigger-driven business process across SaaS apps.
- You want a visual builder and 400+ integrations.
- Self-hosting the whole stack for free matters (Community Edition).
- One agent step inside a workflow is enough.
Can you use BAND and n8n together?
Teams that run n8n rarely replace it. A reasonable split: n8n keeps the scheduled, trigger-driven automations, and BAND hosts the open-ended agent collaboration. n8n is not on BAND's published integrations list as of September 2026, so connecting the two means using BAND's Python or TypeScript SDK or an MCP bridge you set up. Ask BAND about the current recommended path before you plan around it.
How much do BAND and n8n cost?
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| BAND Free | $0 | Single user, non-commercial; 20 remote agents, 250 rooms |
| BAND Pro | $17.99/mo | 40 remote + 40 native agents, 500 rooms |
| BAND Enterprise | Custom | Teams, unlimited agents |
| n8n Community Edition | Free | Self-hosted, no execution limits |
| n8n Starter | €20/mo (billed annually) | 2,500 executions, 5 concurrent |
| n8n Pro | €50/mo (billed annually) | 10,000 executions, 20 concurrent |
| n8n Business | €667/mo (billed annually) | 40,000 executions, self-hosted option |
| n8n Enterprise | Custom | 200+ concurrent, SLA |
Prices from vendor pages, September 2026
Watch-outs
- There is no native n8n adapter in BAND today; plan for SDK or MCP integration work.
- n8n prices in euros on its site; USD pricing was not shown when we checked.
- BAND Enterprise pricing is by quote.
What else do people ask about BAND vs n8n?
Can n8n do multi-agent?
Yes, within a workflow. n8n agents can delegate to other agents and run on a schedule. Coordination follows the workflow you build.
Is n8n open source?
n8n is fair-code under the Sustainable Use License, which is not an OSI-approved open-source license. The Community Edition is free to self-host.
Does n8n support A2A?
We did not find A2A documented in n8n's docs in September 2026. It supports MCP as both client and server.
How does n8n count agent usage?
One turn with an agent counts as one execution, and paid plans include a set number of executions per month.
Where do these facts come from?
Reviewed Sep 2026
Which comparisons should you read next?
BAND vs CrewAI
CrewAI runs a crew well. BAND lets that crew work with agents and people outside it.
Collaboration layerRole-based crews
Read comparisonOpenAI Agents SDK vs LangGraph
The Agents SDK is the quickest path to working handoffs; LangGraph is the deeper toolkit for complex state.
Lightweight SDKGraph framework
Read comparison